The Daily Dish today quotes Dreher on the demise of newspapers:
I don’t know that the most brilliant and enlightened publisher with a staff of geniuses could have figured out how to make a daily newspaper survive the advent of the Internet. I think about the small corner of the newspaper world that’s my bailiwick, the editorial and op-ed pages. I grew up reading whoever was on the op-ed page that day for insight and analysis into issues and current events. Now, I mostly read blogs, because it’s easier for me to find the kind of information I’m interested in, and it’s often written in a more lively, engaging style, frequently by people who, unlike columnists like me, are not generalists. How can a print newspaper, which has a finite amount of space, and which has to cater to a broad audience, hope to compete with that?
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Llewellyn Kriel
October 29, 2009 at 6:45 amYour observations are 100% correct, BUT – and in the developing world is a gigantic “BUT” – the Internet (and its minions, like Michael Palin’s offspring in Monty Python’s “The Meaning Of LIfe”) are only as good as (a) their reach, (b) their usefulness, and (c) their acceptance.
For those reasons, and as long as myopic and authoritarian regimes such as those in Africa and Asia withhold investment in ITC (because it’s dangerous to have educated electorates), newspapers will remain the poison of choice for the masses.
With this situation likely to continue for at least the next 30 years (definitely in Africa), the future of newspapers and radio looks rosey. I wish it were not so, but there it is.