Last Friday in a speech outlining how she and John McCain would aid children with special needs, Palin denounced money spent on scientific research on the fruit-fly(Drosophila melanogaster). She told her audience that good state money was being spent on this research ”in Paris, France”. And ended her little revelation with, ”I kid you not”.
This creature was used in research to show that genes are passed on by the way of chromosomes for which Thomas Hunt Morgan was awarded a Nobel prize in 1933. And the same fly is being used for research into autism at the University of North Carolina in America. And this denouncement was in the same speech outlining aid for special needs children!
In Slate.com today, the entertaining and often spot-on commentator, Christopher Hitchens concludes an opinion piece with these words:
This is what the Republican Party has done to us this year: It has placed within reach of the Oval Office a woman who is a religious fanatic and a proud, boastful ignoramus. Those who despise science and learning are not anti-elitist. They are morally and intellectually slothful people who are secretly envious of the educated and the cultured. And those who prate of spiritual warfare and demons are not just “people of faith” but theocratic bullies. On Nov. 4, anyone who cares for the Constitution has a clear duty to repudiate this wickedness and stupidity.
Also read this Salon.com piece.
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
It is not surprising that Palin’s remarks were interpreted to mean Drosophilia. When fruit flies are mentioned in the context of scientific research, that would be the default interpretation.
The fact that Palin was referring to tax dollars funding research for commercial purposes is not what she is trying to disparage. From this, and previous remarks, I don’t think Palin thinks too deeply about science and scientific research. She supports creationism to be taught alongside evolution – which demonstrates that she has no idea what science even is.
Regardless of the type of fruit fly, its amazing that the first thing she decides to bash is scientifical research, with more people like her in power, less we will have to talk about
“Palin’s remark had nothing to do with Drosophila. She was referring to a bit of earmarked pork, sent to the USDA lab in Paris for the control of Olive Fruit Flies ( Bactrocera Oleae).”
This is also very important research for controling pests and could end up saving many American jobs, not to mention leading to additional genetic discoveries (which these types of research often do). Lets increae funding for science all across the board, and decrease funding for wasteful spending on things such as Palin’s multimillion sports stadium she commissioned in Wasilla.
Richard: “It is my understanding that this species has never been widely used for medical or genetic research.”
You obviously understand little to nothing about medical or genetic research. Drosophila melangoster is perhaps the single most important model organism used in genetic research. I could not even begin detail the enormous contribution to medical science that this organism has provided for us within this post. But I assure you that it would surmount to volumes. The obvious information is also very widespread; Every high school or college Biology textbook devotes special attention to this very important organism.
Dear MS . MR
We are a company specializing in the import of fruits from around the world
Center staple in Egypt
Please send your company products of fruits
Packaging and send and weight, size and number of fruit
Please send the price C & F to Cairo airport and the price C & F to the port of Damietta Port, or Ain Sukhna
Best Regards
Maysara
Al-mass Group CO
Al-oboor market
block 9 offic 310
TEL:0020244770676
FAX:0020225893141
MOB:0020122719048
MAIL:Almass@tedata.net.eg
CHAT:maysara_imp@yahoo.com
richard ridley
October 28, 2008 at 11:12 pmWrong fruit flies!
Palin’s remark had nothing to do with Drosophila. She was referring to a bit of earmarked pork, sent to the USDA lab in Paris for the control of Olive Fruit Flies ( Bactrocera Oleae).
Could those public dollars have been better spent on a study on the potential genetic origins of Autism? I think so. Let the Olive farmers pay for their own research.
It is my understanding that this species has never been widely used for medical or genetic research. So, I suppose, Hitchens’ piece needs a correction from Slate.
This earmark was made famous by Citizens Against Government Waste, and was readily available to anyone who had bothered to check.
The organization doing the researcch is tha USDA, as in agriculture. Rep. Thompson got some free research for fat cat farmers in Napa Valley.