Current Font Size:

I am now more convinced than ever that Obama will win the US election. Read this transcript (taken from the CBS News website) of the Katie Couric interview with Sarah Palin. Does she saying anything?

Katie Couric, CBS News anchor, asked Sarah Palin about the $700 billion government bailout of bad debt – and whether she supports it.

Palin: I’m all about the position that America is in and that we have to look at a $700 billion bailout. And as Sen. McCain has said unless this nearly trillion dollar bailout is what it may end up to be, unless there are amendments in Paulson’s proposal, really I don’t believe that Americans are going to support this and we will not support this. The interesting thing in the last couple of days that I have seen is that Americans are waiting to see what John McCain will do on this proposal. They’re not waiting to see what Barack Obama is going to do. Is he going to do this and see what way the political wind’s blowing? They’re waiting to see if John McCain will be able to see these amendments implemented in Paulson’s proposal.

Couric: Why do you say that? Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama?

Palin: He’s got the track record of the leadership qualities and the pragmatism that’s needed at a crisis time like this.

Couric: But polls have shown that Sen. Obama has actually gotten a boost as a result of this latest crisis, with more people feeling that he can handle the situation better than John McCain.

Palin: I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?

Couric: If this doesn’t pass, do you think there’s a risk of another Great Depression?

Palin: Unfortunately, that is the road that America may find itself on. Not necessarily this, as it’s been proposed, has to pass or we’re going to find ourselves in another Great Depression. But, there has got to be action – bipartisan effort – Congress not pointing fingers at one another but finding the solution to this, taking action, and being serious about the reforms on Wall Street that are needed.

Couric: Would you support a moratorium on foreclosures to help average Americans keep their homes?

Palin: That’s something that John McCain and I have both been discussing – whether that … is part of the solution or not. You know, it’s going to be a multi-faceted solution that has to be found here.

Couric: So you haven’t decided whether you’ll support it or not?

Palin: I have not.

Couric: What are the pros and cons of it do you think?

Palin: Oh, well, some decisions that have been made poorly should not be rewarded, of course.

Couric: By consumers, you’re saying?

Palin: Consumers – and those who were predator lenders also. That’s, you know, that has to be considered also. But again, it’s got to be a comprehensive, long-term solution found … for this problem that America is facing today. As I say, we are getting into crisis mode here.

Couric: You’ve said, quote, “John McCain will reform the way Wall Street does business.” Other than supporting stricter regulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two years ago, can you give us any more example of his leading the charge for more oversight?

Palin: I think that the example that you just cited, with his warnings two years ago about Fannie and Freddie – that, that’s paramount. That’s more than a heck of a lot of other senators and representatives did for us.

Couric: But he’s been in Congress for 26 years. He’s been chairman of the powerful Commerce Committee. And he has almost always sided with less regulation, not more.

Palin: He’s also known as the maverick though, taking shots from his own party, and certainly taking shots from the other party. Trying to get people to understand what he’s been talking about – the need to reform government.

Couric: But can you give me any other concrete examples? Because I know you’ve said Barack Obama is a lot of talk and no action. Can you give me any other examples in his 26 years of John McCain truly taking a stand on this?

Palin: I can give you examples of things that John McCain has done, that has shown his foresight, his pragmatism, and his leadership abilities. And that is what America needs today.

Couric: I’m just going to ask you one more time – not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation.

Palin: I’ll try to find you some and I’ll bring them to you.

Related posts:

  1. Sarah Palin says good bye It’s the end of a great story for me. The...
  2. Sarah Palin. Best thing to ever happen to the Internet I follow her, but because of the time difference between...
  3. Sarah Palin had ‘considered’ abortion In a surprising revelation, it appears that pro-life Republican Governor,...
  4. Sarah Palin accepts Letterman’s apology Sarah Palin has accepted David Letterman’s apology on Monday...
  5. Zuma and Palin. Any similarities? Pierre de Vos on Constitutional Speaking spots the similarities between...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

 


Comments

 

Ray Hartley

September 25, 2008 at 12:36 pm

LOL!

 

SoulDeep

September 25, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Oh Palin what would american politics be without you. She’s as cunning as Gwede Mantashe at press interviews!

 

jorj bush's inglish teechr

September 25, 2008 at 1:19 pm

how pathetic! Notice she didn’t answer one single question from Katie – it’s all conclusory statements with no examples to back it up. Any one with a college education could have performed better than this Barbie doll

 

gman

September 25, 2008 at 2:12 pm

Just keep delaying the debates!!!!!!!

 

Dingaan

September 25, 2008 at 2:36 pm

History makes me doubt white USns. They will Obama becuase they’re out of ideas and leadership in white folks.

But did Obama promised as didvedends to those who financed his campaign? *** for tat!!

 

Amy D.

September 25, 2008 at 3:58 pm

This transcript is not correct. She never used a “g” at the end of any word. Why was it edited and corrected?

For example, she said “goin’…interestin’…waitin’…”, etc. She also didn’t say, “I’ll bring them to you.” She actually said, “I’ll bring ‘em to ya.”

There should be no editing of any candidates remarks.

 

Ken

September 25, 2008 at 4:40 pm

Oh my God…. just give us 1 example of the self proclaimed “maverick” in action over 26 years and she can’t!..she will TRY to find some and get back with her…. noting like being informed and prepared… this would be comical, if it weren’t so important…I wonder if she can say Democratic landslide…

 

Matt

September 25, 2008 at 5:45 pm

omg. the video clip. more cringy than the first season of The Office.

 

jimgreen1

September 25, 2008 at 5:49 pm

i ain’t wantin’ to keep runnin’ for VP anymore ya’ll this is hard stuff. i want to get back to a huntin’ and get these lights off me…

 

Cynthia

September 25, 2008 at 5:52 pm

Oh, drat–the transcript misses the part where Palin licks her finger and holds it up in front of the camera like she’s trying to feel non-existent wind at the time she’s talking about Obama apparently “going to do this and see what way the political wind’s blowing”.

 

Shawnda

September 25, 2008 at 6:42 pm

WHAT AN IDIOT…IS THIS WHO IS GOING TO RUN THE COUNTRY IF MCCAIN DIES IN OFFICE…YEAH RIGHT!!!

 

Stephen

September 25, 2008 at 8:17 pm

Wow…. Just wow…. I didn’t realize anyone could be that stupid and non-forthcoming. If McCain and SP are elected – America is doomed.

 

Patrick Sherwood

September 25, 2008 at 8:33 pm

If this is the best that McCain could do for a V.P. choice, he does not deserve the Presidency. I do not see how McCain can allow her to participate in a debate with Sen. Biden. She is a media disaster. My colleagues and I are not impressed. Nor should the electorate be and especially the undecided voters. By the way, is anyone going to mention McCain’s involvement in the Keating 5 Savings and Loan scandal during this campaign? I agree he was a Maverick who cleverly escaped disaster back then. Good Luck John McCain, you lost this undecided voter!

 

Lisa McIntyre

September 25, 2008 at 8:38 pm

Count me as one more person who was going to vote for McCain but gets further and further from him every time Palin opens her mouth.

Count me as one more woman who is disappointed that this was the best female Republican he could come up with.

 

Kym Hayes

September 25, 2008 at 8:57 pm

I cannot believe that some Republicans will still vote for these idiots. If I were a true Republican (and I am not) then I just wouldn’t vote. They are a joke. John McCain and Sarah Palin are both uncapable of running this country. McCain has taken this campaign and made a circus out of it.

 

Roncol

September 26, 2008 at 3:22 am

I think the election was decided tonight.

 

Mawmaw shoe

September 26, 2008 at 3:46 am

Katie’s interview with Palin was almost hostile. I thought Katie was very unkind to Sarah Palin, from a political, reporter,and from a human spirit aspect. I have never heard her ask questions of Obama or Bidden as complex
or hostile as she questioned Palin. Maybe if she or the other liberal media did, they would find out what the democrats know or don’t know. Who the heck cares whether or not or when one gets a passport? I guess she has to prove herself in the company of all those liberal network male counterparts. Katie has gone from assertiveness to agressiveness.

 

Diane Shoemaker

September 26, 2008 at 3:55 am

Katie’s interview with Palin was almost hostile. I thought Katie was very unkind to Sarah Palin, from a political, reporter,and from a human spirit aspect. I have never heard her ask questions of Obama or Bidden as complex
or hostile as she questioned Palin. Maybe if she or the other liberal media did, they would find out what the democrats know or don’t know. Who the heck cares whether or not or when one gets a passport? I guess she has to prove herself in the company of all those liberal network male counterparts. Katie has gone from assertiveness to agressiveness.

 

Judith

September 26, 2008 at 4:11 am

Wake up America!
this is serious business.
The fun and games with parading the beauty queen are over!
We already lost the world’s respect by having a not so sharp thinking President for the last 8 yrs.
Sara Palin can make us into the laughingstock of the universe.
We have SO MANY intelligent, COMPETENT people in this country, let’s give them the power!

 

Cream Juicy

September 26, 2008 at 4:53 am

This would be hilarious, if it weren’t so scary. Though it’s still hilarious. God help us.

 

Ibukun, NC

September 26, 2008 at 7:44 am

Let’s be frank folks, if it were Obama putting up this performance, he would have been laughed out of the building early in the primaries. Palin is an embarrassment to the multitude of women who would have handled this interview a hundred times better!

 

susan mayers

September 26, 2008 at 8:24 am

Oh my G-D ! what an AWFUL embarrassment of an interview with Palin that was – NONSENSE – ! Poor America, we must be a laughing stock to the rest of the world, were it not for the utter seriousness of the financial melt – down. I personally desire that an
EXTRA-ORDINARY person (male/femail/black/white/) be elected to this extraordinary job of being president of the united states. I do NOT want an ordinary person to have this job at all!!!!! And I personally do not care if I like them AS LONG AS THEY ARE EFFECTIVE!!!!! AAAAAAAAAARGH!

 

Christina

September 26, 2008 at 5:36 pm

Is THIS what the Media said energized the Republican Party???
The sadly inappropriate Sarah Palin is the equivalent of self-immolation for the Republican Party!
Laughable woman, makes me wonder what on earth she’s doing in politics. Just like Murphy’s Law says, she was promoted to her level of incompetence. It’s strange enough that she was governor of Alaska with the “brain” she commands, she should have known her inadequacy well enough to stay right there as governor, and not attract any spotlight on her.

 

Peggy McGilligan

September 26, 2008 at 11:35 pm

“I’m just going to ask you one more time – not to belabor the point.” A.) Belabor: argue or elaborate (a subject) in excessive detail: belabor the obvious. B.) Point: an argument or idea put forward by a person in discussion: he made the point that economic regulation involves controls on pricing. Was Katie Couric making a point, or was she asking a question? Beyond the two pertinent and most recent examples of John McCain’s record, was Katie eliciting information in excessive detail, or just murdering the King’s English? Ms. Couric did in fact ask for a list, and Ms. Palin offered to provide it. What’s the correct answer? You’re right Katie, John is an obvious fake and I’m totally clueless. D’oh! Sorry for not being more straightforward, but it’s moose hunting season. Come-on up to the cabin; you can see the Kremlin from the roof. I’ve got two new moose hats, one for both you and Charlie Gibson: http://theseedsof9-11.com

 

Ashok Grover

September 28, 2008 at 3:39 am

I am not an American but I am not conservative. I would like somebody to tell me how does Sarah Palin rate with:

1. Bush -8 years-19% approval rating- many Americans on CNN call him a moron and a lame duck – Congress has even lesser approval rating of 9%)
2. President Clinton: No war for 8 years,great trade and budget surplus- also a lame duck towards end term for having oral *** in office.

Can Sarah do worse? Perhaps she would have policy advisers (hopefully better than Nixon did). She is no Harvard graduate like me and the most of you. Why not give the Hockey Mom and yourself a break?!!

 

Lucinda

September 29, 2008 at 6:32 am

There is an error in the transcript of this article. In the 5th paragraph, the transcript has Palin saying “I’m all about the position that America is in and that we have to look at a $700 billion bailout.” This sounds like a quote from an airheaded teenager. It was clear to me that Palin said “I’m ILL about the position that America is in…” Makes a difference, doesn’t it? Was this transcribed by an airhead, or someone who assumed she is, and would say that. Responsible, accurate reporting? Perhaps because I live in Minnesota, and some people here have speech patterns similar to Palin’s, this was obvious to me. Or maybe I’m predisposed because I like Palin, others hear what they want because they DON’T like her. A lot of Minnesotans love McCain-Palin. This is the first time this state has a chance of going republican since 1972! Maybe it’s because we understand what she’s saying!

 

margie kipping

October 5, 2008 at 4:22 am

I am not surprised by the obvious bias of Katie Couric , Barbara Walters and many more. Where are the fair and unbiased reporters? For this reason I will not be watching ABC, NBC and CBS networks until after the election. We must not be swayed by false hopes but by truth and the undeniable need for experience in this up coming election.
Your life and saftey depend on it.



Leave a Comment