TWO accidents yesterday sent warning signals about the state of South Africa’s rail and air transportation ahead of the 2010 World Cup.
The horrific head-on collision between two trains has cost a pregnant mother her life.
It was an entirely avoidable collision that appears to have been the result of human error.
But human error should long have been eliminated as a potential cause of rail accidents by the introduction of fail-safe anti-collision technology.
The billions spent on upgrading our transport infrastructure should have considered such technology.
Train Anti-Collision Systems, as they are known, appear to have passed our transport authorities by.
Such systems automatically stop trains that are approaching each other on the same line, preventing any contact.
The second accident, involving an Airlink plane which overshot the runway at George to end up on a busy tarred road adjacent to the airport, should cause as much concern to government.
It is time that the authorities conducted a full investigation into the cause of this airline’s growing list of safety problems.
The prospect of an air or rail crash during next year’s World Cup is horrifying.
It could take decades for this country to recover from the negative images that would result from such a tragedy.
But equally horrifying is the danger that South Africans continue to face on taxis, trains, buses and planes each day.
Commuting ought to be a safe, routine experience. But for many South Africans the trip to and from work is a dice with death in a speeding crowded vehicle with poor safety precautions in place.

Related posts:

  1. How far are we from an SAA tragedy?
  2. Election 2009: The rebirth of South African democracy
  3. Is South Africa ready for a terror assault?
  4. South African minister’s shocking anti-semitic remarks
  5. DA wins in Gugulethu: Was this the biggest election upset in South African history?

 


Comments

 

Steven

December 8, 2009 at 7:43 am

Human “ERA” ???
From an editor?
Oy vey!

 

Mlungisi

December 8, 2009 at 8:32 am

Lol. I guess in this ERA anything goes…

 

Dan

December 8, 2009 at 9:51 am

“involving an Airlink plan”
“human era”

Please proof read your work or get someone else to. I think your disgusting writing and reporting in general is of more concern to SA at this time.

 

Thinus

December 8, 2009 at 10:07 am

Our education system has obviously failed you Mr Hartley.

Is this the “era” of bad writing?

Era should be error.
Plan should be plain.
“A dice with death” should be a gamble with death.

 

MoMo

December 8, 2009 at 1:06 pm

@ Thinus

“Plan should be plain”

plain should be plane

 

Jen

December 8, 2009 at 2:08 pm

Give him a break, guys – it was just human “era”!

Seriously though – this is what happens when you rely on spellcheck – do proof readers even exist anymore? They should – perhaps we should apply for the job!

 

Ray Hartley

December 9, 2009 at 6:30 am

Thinus, MoMo – I think what you meant to say was “plan should be plane”. It’s okay, we all make mistakes …lol



Leave a Comment