1. Mbeki wins vote = Gets third term as ANC president= Alliance plus populists split off to form left opposition = SA has proper political competion in parliament for the first time = Mbeki grooms sucessor for 2009, probably Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma. Weak president, but not a bad outcome.
2. Mbeki wins vote = Gets third term as ANC president = Alliance plus populists split off to form left opposition = SA has proper political competion in parliament for the first time = Mbeki amends constitution and stands for third term in 2009, ostensibly to keep Zuma threat at bay in national interest. Not good.
3. Zuma wins vote = Purges Mbeki crowd = Gets tried by Scorpions = Leads popular rebellion against criminal justice system = succeeds = Becomes 2009 president of country with no hope of fighting crime. Not good. Move meagre pension into offshore fund.
4. Zuma wins vote = Purges Mbeki crowd = Gets tried by Scorpions = Leads popular rebellion against criminal justice system = fails = Deputy Kgalema Motlanthe takes over = Motlanthe presidency in 2009. Not a bad outcome.
Related posts:
I’ve been working on a strategy to market an offshore investment product that does not require Reserve Bank clearance, if you’re interested.
… I didn’t say there wasn’t a bucket-load of cash to made out of all the above scenarios …
could someone please explain to me who/what the hell this ‘peepool’ is the ancyl chairman keeps referring to? is he trying to say poephol or people? or does he actually mean PEE POOL?!
Or option 5:
Mbeki calls an election right now and minimizes damage to the ANC and the country.
David Rama
December 17, 2007 at 10:12 pmso the bad news is that it’s a 50/50 chance of a bad outcome. the good news is that it’s 50/50 either way. oh well.