All Times LIVE Blogs
Minor Matters
18 minutes ago
Common Dialogue
1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Good Times
7 hours ago
The 5th Official
7 hours, 20 minutes agoView all Times LIVE Blogs
The bull that may or may not be killed at King Goodwill Zwelithini’s Enyokeni Palace in Nongoma on December 5, seems to have kicked up more dust than all the mine dumps combined. Now that’s what I call bull dust.
Animal rights activists are up in arms while the Kingdom is digging in its heels in the name of culture, tradition, customs and all things related. Animal Rights Africa (ARA) went to the Pietermaritzburg High Court to stop the ritual.
At the heart of the bull dust is the “cruel” manner in which the beast will be killed, or so I am made to believe. All things being equal, is there any other less cruel way to kill a bull except giving it lethal injection? At most slaughterhouses, otherwise known as abattoirs, they shoot bulls. At religious-based ones, they cut its throat.
So if the “cruelty” is measured by time, the time it takes for the bull to die that is, then who has actually timed the various methods? During the graduation ceremony of the young Zulu braves, they break the bull’s neck.
Have the animal rights people been to the big chicken farms that supply our supermarkets and seen how they kill the chickens?
A friend of mine says the outcry is nothing but the manifestation of a pervasive cultural imperialism. I am tempted to believe him.
Speaking on cultural imperialism, African philosopher, Frantz Fanon told the Congress of Black African Writers in 1959 that colonial domination, because it is total and tends to over-simplify, very soon manages to disrupt in spectacular fashion the cultural life of a conquered people.
“This cultural obliteration is made possible by the negation of national reality, by new legal relations introduced by the occupying power, by the banishment of the natives and their customs to outlying districts by colonial society, by expropriation, and by the systematic enslaving of men and women,” he said.
“Every effort is made to bring the colonised person to admit the inferiority of his culture which has been transformed into instinctive patterns of behaviour, to recognise the unreality of his ‘nation’, and, in the last extreme, the confused and imperfect character of his own biological structure,” Fanon said.
He said national culture under colonial domination is a contested culture whose destruction is sought in systematic fashion. The sentiment of this speech was also captured and expanded on in his most famous book The Wretched of the Earth.
Animal Rights Africa spokesman Michele Pickover told the media that:”It physically pains us and is an affront to our dignity that an animal is made to suffer in such an overtly cruel and protracted way”.
But Inkatha Freedom Party has accused the animal rights body of being biased in their campaign. In the Motion he tabled before the KwaZulu-Natal Legislature in Pietermaritzburg the organisation’s MPL Blessed Gwala, it was strange that the same organization has never raised a voice against Spanish bullfighting, and fishing which he said caused suffering to the fish.
I also think fishing for sport is one of the most cruel pastimes where the fish is caught and released over and over again by different fishermen. I guess animal rights people who have DSTV watch that all the time.
“The whole approach of these so-called activists in our view is intended to disdainfully depict His Majesty and the Zulu nation as people who are still trapped in darkness.”
Well, let’s take this animal rights stuff all the way. How about horse riding in all its forms? Have horses told the animal rights people that they like being ridden and whipped? Animals in captivity suffer emotionally all their lives, but there is not even a whimper about banning zoos and the likes.
Until this happens and there are calls for the ban of all slaughtering of animals for food, whether the Western, Asian or African way, this bull story will remain in our minds as nothing more than the tired “our ways are better than yours” mantra.
In The Wretched of the Earth, Fanon says in the battle for cultural dominance, while the masses maintain intact traditions which are completely different from those of the colonial situation, the so-called intellectual throws himself in frenzied fashion into the frantic acquisition of the culture of the occupying power. He takes every opportunity to criticise his own culture.
This was said by Fanon in 1959, and it seems nothing has changed since. Racial tolerance will forever remain a pipe dream unless it is preceded or accompanied by cultural tolerance. The message this bull story communicates to the Zulu nation is that “you can practice your culture as long as it is acceptable to us”, whhich is what prompted Gwala to say the IFP finds it strange that “this organization” has chosen to make a public noise about this custom when they did not approach the King respectfully long before the season of this ceremony arrived.
Me thinks it was all for media mileage.
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Of course the King should be allowed to kill his bull and you are right to point out that animal cruelty is a reality that the ‘modern’ world perpetuates as much if not more than any traditional culture ever did.
However you rather hysterical claim that animal rights activists are somehow imperialist is nonsense, knee-jerk, paranoia. The urge amongst many in your country, including yourself it seems, to label anything they find annoying as either “racist” or “imperialist”, although perhaps understandable given your country’s history, is wearing a little thin after 15 years of independence.
Plus, of course, such extremist tendencies lead you to make factual errors. In point of fact animal rights groups DO complain against, factory farms, bullfighting, zoos, sport fishing, hunting, and even horseback riding. That they also criticize King Goodwill’s bull slaughter simply shows that they are consistent, not imperialist.
You may not agree with them, I certainly don’t all the time, but to claim that Animal Rights Groups are singling out traditional cultural practices for extra punishment is nonsense and speaks more to your sad willingness to play the ‘victim card’ over offering an insightful analysis.
I have sympathy for the Zulu people digging in their heels to protect the cultural heritage.
Anti-Activist organisations have the tendency to be very liberal with facts and get their scores by emotionally charging issues. Their statements on how the bull is killed contains blatant lies, and no matter how the Zulu people resist, readers will remember the ARA ’s “facts”.
Campaigns like this have a common thread; just look at gunfree SA, an organisation without any public credibility, but foreign funded. They will spew their lies , unfazed by real facts , and score political points.
The sad thing is: people will rather believe emotional claptrap than use their brains.
I have not seen one piece in the media asking what precisely happens at the ceremony, as described by a participant.
Why is the question not asked and printed?
I am sorry for you, the Zulu traditionalists, but politics and emotion is going to beat you on this one.
if you had the choice of having your tongue pulled out and sand shoved down your throat, all the while having someone mutilating your genitals (all obviously reported in the media), or a quick bolt through the head, which would you choose, maybe you can test the different methods and come back to us as to which you preferred? culture, tradition, imperialism, blah, blah maybe try common sense. remember cannibalism was also a culture and tradition? we all move on (like fox hunting in the uk) for obvious reasons maybe you should too.
this is totally disguisting.this animal rights group does not have a clear mandate and policy on what to criticise and not.our culture can not be dictated by the courts.
farmers who own 100s of cows torture cows by marking them with a red hot iron at the back everyday, everyyear.now that his majesty is doing a cultural event which takes place in 1 day and not more than ten cows are killed they make noise about it.there’s a deep meaning to the men who are chosen to kill the beast.if they do not understand.it’s simple, just stay out.
Keep the Zulu Culture Alive!!
We do not understand the depth of our misplaced concerns. Do we know what really happens at our killing stations called abattoirs. Even if we think it is humane one must spend a morning to experience the grive of the animals.
But this is nothing compared to what the intolerant western world contribute to global warming or pollution of the oceans.
What about the Zebra that was killed wrongly to protect no one against Ingana sickness. How many people understand the pain that was carved into a tradition by superior ill informed white man.
Today I am sad and ashamed to experience Colonialism all over again. I will never say I am sorry to Appartheid. I did not part take in it out off my free will, but cannot sit back and see how we destroy a culture just because we do not like it … I bow my head in shame and appollogise to the King for not being able to do more to stop this drive.
I would appreciate the facts about what exactly is being proposed. I heard so far 3 versions: Initiation to manhood of 30 or 40 youth, a new Chief’s inauguration, and now a First crop thanks giving.
I heard the slaughter was to be achieved by first gouging the bull’s eyes’ out, then wrenching off its genitals and tongue bare handed, and then bare handedly beating it finally to death.A Zulu acquaintance of mine was aghast when I related the above to him. He didn’t think the extended pain of this slaughter was part of these customary ceremonies at all. And he lives near the King!
I am disappointed that this matter is being used to drag up worn out views about our past.
We really must move on. There is much vital campaigning against various abuses in our country. I find the proposed Extremely Brutal slaughtering of the Bull [if true as reported] inconsistent with our aim to become a more moral and caring people, while still embracing our various backgrounds and customs.
Khas
November 25, 2009 at 10:05 pmThis is the problem in Africa and Fanon was right. We have so easily accepted the culture of the Europeans, because this culture is so appealing and tempting – but is it good? White people are making us feel guitly about our culture and traditions, and we are giving in to them. This is Africa and these things need to be respected why must we always give in to what the Europeans think. We stoppeed discipling our children the way it worked and now children have no direction, We accepted homosexuality and the number of people thinking they are ***, is increasing for the wrong reasons. We accept porn and swearing and immorality on Tv and our culture is one of respect for our elders and our woman. Apartheid really ruined us, and we ourselves as black people are continuing this downward spiral ourselves because we want to be like that, but what good does it serve and what is it building. What can build we must hold, what can kill, we must destroy.